There ain't no way to hide your lying eyes



Morning all.

The problem about telling lies is that sooner or later they catch up with you.......

This is a copy of a response to one of  Cristobell's rants, submitted today, and which will almost certainly  fail to see the light of day. This would normally allow Cristobell to allege she has been abused or even that the posts she has withheld contain illegal material.

Now - I really hate liars.

I used to post occasionally on her blog, until I posted something she didn't like. She then proceeded to withhold my posts and lie about their content, so I took my clickbait elsewhere.

There will be much more to follow. Keep a copy of your posts. If she bins them, send them to me, and I'll publish them here (I allow anonymous posting)

To make it easier to follow, my words are in red, Cristobell's posts are in black, and the words of the withheld poster will be in a contrasting colour



"Responses that demonstrate the very hysteria I am talking about. There is something very strange about those bombarding me with abuse. And that they are working together to silence me should disturb everyone."

Nobody is working together. You need to stop taking the paranoia pills.

 "These are not teenagers trying to drive another teenager to suicide, they are adults, some of whom claiming to be professionals, saying things like 'your parents never loved you' to a manic depressive."

An outright, shameless lie.
You were the one who said the following:
" 'Any child who is loved enough will not grow up to a be a criminal' (unknown). To that I would add, 'any child who is loved enough will not grow up to be a victim'."

As you, despite your protestations to the contrary, became a victim, your reasoning would place the blame at the door of your parents, or are you incapable of making that leap of logic? And don't pretend you weren't a victim - you wrote a book about it!

 "As concerned citizens, they are writing to 'relevant bodies' to inform them that I should not be trusted with children, ie. that I am a paedophile."

Another outright lie.

The observation made was that, had you been employed in a position where you had responsibility for child safety, such as teaching, your inability to understand the principles of safeguarding would be something that should be raised as a concern. At no point did anyone accuse you of being a paedophile - something, incidentally, you are seemingly doing to others here.

 "As the proverbial kicking goes on and on, they ask 'do you give in yet?', because if I don't state they are right, the kicking will continue."

Complete nonsense. If you can't debate like a supposed adult, then don't have a blog and invite comment.

"Regardless, I have published enough I hope, to illustrate how fanatical these 'concerned citizens' are."

Really, Ros? We are not the ones repeatedly blogging on the topic and sending our regards to jailed paedophiles

 "Their obsession with child sexual abuse goes off the scale, it blinds them to the real horrors that are far more prevalent, and all around them. The poverty, deprivation and ignorance that is the breeding ground for abuse"

What a fucking nerve. How many times is this now that you have blogged on the topic? 
Even the words you have just used there - "It blinds them to the real horrors" - illustrates perfectly how twisted your attitude is. You appear not to regard child sexual abuse as abuse at all, and certainly not in the same league as physical abuse, which is what you claim to have suffered from. You constantly downplay the impact of CSA on the victims and can only see the issues with reference to your own circumstances.
You describe poverty, deprivation and ignorance as ''the real horrors''. No Ros - they are YOUR horrors, and no-one has suffered like you, have they?

"I can demolish any one of the pathetic excuses you put forward for your bizarre behaviour, your fixation on the sexual side of child abuse especially but they are peppered with so many demeaning, dehumanising, personal insults that I can't be arsed."

Again, you are the one sending your regards to convicted paedophiles and describing your lack of understanding or concern for the victims in your numerous blogs on the topic, so don't even try that trick, lady. 

You can also forget the insinuation that you are withholding posts because they contain abusive material. I challenge you to publish EVERY POST SUBMITTED, so people can see for themselves, otherwise you are a liar.

I will ensure this is published elsewhere, in case you don't. 

"Meanwhile, the police investigating the disappearance of Madeleine, and the child protection part of the Madeleine campaign, would probably find much of interest in my spam box."

Do it, you lying bitch. I dare you. 

Comments

  1. Once again that spam box, all IPs sent on to the police. I’m still waiting for my perfectly civil questions - inconvenient as they were - to be answered. Not that they were ever published.
    Then there was the tabloid interview in which she portrayed all those questioning the McCs as ‘trolls’ - before that the hilarious interview by Poulton, where the interviewer was providing answers to her own questions as La Hutton only wished to talk about herself and her hard life.
    To be fair - she’s generous enough, if she’s really a manic depressive she trying to get as many people as possible to join her. A serious risk when reading her prose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She really is a thoroughly unpleasant character. And staggeringly ignorant. I don't believe half her hard-luck stories, she contradicts herself far too often. Any time she is put on the spot she lashes out at whoever has put her there or runs away and hides behind one of her gruesome pals. I'd like to see her run off into the sunset with Bjorn - save them from spoiling another pair.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Witnesses

No answer was the stern reply