Predator 2

-





"
Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton22 February 2018 at 13:04
Take your mind off child sex for two minutes 10:17, and maybe look up the word predator, it applies in lots of situations."


When used in the context of child safety, what other situations do you mean? You introduced the word ''predator'', Ros, then leave this very rude reply to a perfectly reasonable observation. On the one hand you are saying "there are predators everywhere" and on the other you are dismissing the official estimate because 'you are not buying it'
23 February 2018 at 08:55


A reply was received


 "Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton23 February 2018 at 09:36
Everything is black and white for you 08:56, you seem incapable of holding two seemingly contradictory statements in your head at any one time. 

I was using predator in the broader sense, the clue was in 'take your mind of child sex'. 

Predators come in many guises 08:56, users, liars, manipulators, con-artists, psychopaths who suck the life out of you to make themselves feel better. All predators of the non child sex variety, all potential dangers to our children, not just in childhood but for the rest of their lives."

Fascinating. Except you are the one who brought up 'child sex' actually; I am assuming you were in fact referring to child sexual abuse.

So basically you are now applying the term ''predator'' to anyone who isn't very nice. The term actually means those who exploit others, so now that we've got that sorted out, and given that you have been provided with data on the prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse from several published, robust sources, can you now please tell us what the real figure for ''active paedophiles' is in the UK, seeing as you are not buying the expert's data?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A little update

-
Well, as readers can see, a number of these posts have either been binned, or published then binned She says it is because she is '' not giving the spiteful and the malicious a platform to abuse me." Well, I cannot see where she has been abused, yet a number of these posts have been withheld. Don't pretend to be in favour of free speech, Ros. If you were, you wouldn't duck behind the delete key
Read more

There ain't no way to hide your lying eyes

-
Morning all. The problem about telling lies is that sooner or later they catch up with you....... This is a copy of a response to one of  Cristobell's rants, submitted today, and which will almost certainly  fail to see the light of day. This would normally allow Cristobell to allege she has been abused or even that the posts she has withheld contain illegal material. Now - I really hate liars. I used to post occasionally on her blog, until I posted something she didn't like. She then proceeded to withhold my posts and lie about their content, so I took my clickbait elsewhere. There will be much more to follow. Keep a copy of your posts. If she bins them, send them to me, and I'll publish them here (I allow anonymous posting) To make it easier to follow, my words are in red, Cristobell's posts are in black, and the words of the withheld poster will be in a contrasting colour "Responses that demonstrate the very hysteria I am talking about. There i
Read more

Sheer Ignorance

-
Here's another In this, she is still disputing the official estimates of the number of active paedophiles operating in the UK Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 21 February 2018 at 10:22 No. I think it is hugely inflated to spread fear, suspicion and paranoia. It is hugely divisive, suggesting NO man can be trusted, it is putting a distance between men and children that is heart breaking. Police, teachers, doctors, writers, now all have a cloud of suspicion over them that they are paedophiles pretending to be ordinary people - invasion of the body snatchers, Part III. Nope, not buying it. What is your evidence that it is inflated, hugely or otherwise? I provided a statistic the other day showing that more than 100,000 men in the UK had convictions for CSA  at a given point in recent years You surely acknowledge that those with actual convictions represents the tip of the iceberg?  So what is your issue with an estimate of 700,000? Where does it suggest that ''
Read more